Advertisement

Four Key Findings from the House Ethics Report on Matt Gaetz


 New information regarding the former congressman's alleged behavior, at least one new accusation, and insights into the panel's inquiry were all included in the House Ethics Committee report on Trump associate Matt Gaetz, which was made public on Monday.


According to the report, the committee found that the former congressman from Florida had sex with a 17-year-old girl, used or possessed illegal drugs, accepted gifts that were not allowed in the House, paid women for "engaging in sexual activity" on a regular basis, and assisted a woman in getting a passport between at least 2017 and 2020.

In 2016, the 42-year-old was elected to the US House of Representatives for the first time as a Republican. 

Days before the report was to be released to the public and after Trump named him his choice for US attorney general, he resigned in November. A week later, Gaetz pulled out of consideration.

He has accused the committee of carrying out an unfair probe and rejected its conclusions.

These four sections of the eagerly awaited study are particularly noteworthy.

A Complex Money Trail
The House Ethics Committee report revealed that Matt Gaetz paid over $90,000 (£71,843) to women for sex and drugs, creating a complicated web of transactions that were difficult to trace.

The committee could not fully determine whether these payments were compensation for engaging in sexual activity with Gaetz. He allegedly used his associate, Joel Greenberg—currently serving 11 years in prison for crimes committed with Gaetz—as an intermediary. Gaetz reportedly accessed Greenberg's SeekingArrangement.com account, a "luxury dating site," to interact with young women.

Gaetz also made direct payments to women, sometimes via platforms like Venmo, though he often used someone else's PayPal account or one linked to a fake name. The report highlights one instance where Gaetz gave a college student a cheque made out to "cash" with "tuition reimbursement" in the memo, which she said she received after a group encounter, describing it as potentially coercive because she "really needed the money."

Gaetz has defended these payments as gifts, not transactions. However, the committee found that two women, aged 27 and 25, did not view their relationships as transactional. One woman, who was considered his girlfriend, invoked her Fifth Amendment right when asked about receiving money for sex or drugs.

The committee also tried to prove that Gaetz frequently paid for sex, citing a text exchange where Gaetz objected to a woman's request for money after accusing her of "ditching" him. The woman responded that she was "treated differently" than others he paid for sex.

Another text from his then-girlfriend indicated financial constraints, with her referring to "customer appreciation week" and later mentioning that Gaetz would be "generous" because of it.

< /p>

As a Congressman, Gaetz earned $174,000 (£138,843) annually, but his net worth was higher, with assets worth at least $575,000 reported in his latest federal financial disclosure. His father, Don Gaetz, co-founder of Vitas Healthcare, has a fortune of around $35 million, according to Forbes.

Sex, Drugs, and Passport Applications
The committee also reported that Gaetz purchased illegal drugs or reimbursed others for them. It cited his alleged use of cocaine, ecstasy/MDMA, and a heavy marijuana habit. He reportedly asked women to bring marijuana cartridges to meetings and used a fake-name email account to buy marijuana.

A trip to the Bahamas was allegedly funded by an associate of Gaetz, who had connections to the medical marijuana industry and paid for female escorts to accompany them. One woman claimed that drug and alcohol use at parties impaired her ability to consent fully.

Gaetz's then-girlfriend, who was 21 when they met and "was paid tens of thousands of dollars" during their two-year relationship, often participated in encounters with women and acted as an intermediary.

One woman, who was 17 at the time, claimed she had sex with Gaetz twice at a party in 2017, once in front of others, while under the influence of ecstasy. She received $400 from him afterward. The committee found no evidence that Gaetz knew she was underage, though the legal age of consent in Florida is 18.

The Department of Justice investigated an allegation of sex with a minor but did not file criminal charges. In 2021, Greenberg pleaded guilty to sex trafficking the same girl.

Gaetz also allegedly directed his chief of staff to expedite a passport application for a woman he was involved with, claiming she was a voter in his district, though she was not. He reportedly gave her $1,000, violating House rules that bar using one's position for special favors.

Accusations of Obstruction
The committee also outlined how Gaetz allegedly obstructed its investigation, including failing to produce evidence he claimed would "exonerate" him. The report concluded that Gaetz "continuously sought to deflect, deter, or mislead the Committee in order to prevent his actions from being exposed."

Gaetz accused the committee of being "weaponized" against him and leaking information to the press. He alleged that the panel was working on behalf of former Speaker Kevin McCarthy, whom Gaetz had helped attempt to oust from office.

Despite claiming to have voluntarily produced tens of thousands of records, Gaetz provided only a few hundred, most of which were either irrelevant or publicly available. The committee cited his withholding of information about the Bahamas trip as an example of rule violations related to gifts.

The report also noted delays due to the Justice Department's probe into the allegations, with some witnesses requesting the use of statements they gave to the department. The committee declined, citing concerns about deterring future witnesses.

Committee Chairman's Dissent
The report concluded with a dissenting statement from Ethics Committee Chairman Michael Guest, on behalf of unnamed committee members. While they did not dispute the findings, they disagreed with releasing the report after Gaetz's resignation, which had not occurred since 2006. They argued that doing so "breaks from the Committee's long-standing practice" and could be seen as an attempt to "weaponize" the Committee's process.

Post a Comment

0 Comments